Frank Dancevic vs Mikhail Kukushkin Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L L L L
Form
L L W L W W W L L WH2H: Dancevic 1 - 2 Kukushkin
They have played 8 sets in total, with Dancevic winning 2 and Kukushkin winning 6. The last match between Dancevic and Kukushkin was at the Aegon Nottingham Open - Nottingham, 21-06-2016, Second, Grass with Frank Dancevic getting the victory 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Frank Dancevic | 1 |
| Mikhail Kukushkin | 2 |
Aegon Nottingham Open - Nottingham(21-06-2016)
4
6
7
6
7
6
| Dancevic | Stats | Kukushkin |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (11-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 162 |
| 65 | Highest Rank | 39 |
| 40 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 18 |
| 57% (500-370) | Career Total W/L | 57% (642-493) |
| $779,866 | Career Prize Money | $3,840,550 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tsitsipas VS Struff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Frank Dancevic
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
111)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
57 of
72)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
27%
(
29 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
32 of
111)
109
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Frank Dancevic
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
17 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Frank Dancevic
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 34 | Games Won | 49 |
| 25 | Aces (Total) | 22 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:42:53 | Average Match Time | 1:42:53 |
| 60% (159/263) | 1st Serve % | 62% (150/242) |
| 70% (111/159) | 1st Serve Win % | 83% (124/150) |
| 54% (56/104) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (54/92) |
| 7% (1/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (9/23) |
| 26% (64/242) | Return Points Win % | 37% (96/263) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Frank Dancevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Frank Dancevic
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Frank Dancevic
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Frank Dancevic
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
20 of
23)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Frank Dancevic
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
11
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Alexander Sarkissian
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
14
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Lucas Miedler
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Takanyi Garanganga
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Frank Dancevic
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Frank Dancevic
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Brayden Schnur
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mikhail Kukushkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Matteo Gigante
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
9
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
5 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kei Nishikori
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Bor Artnak
75%
(
68 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
4
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
48 of
63)
13
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
90%
(
37 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Theo Papamalamis
73%
(
103 of
141)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
60 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
128
Total Points Won
124
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (500/370) | Win/Loss | 57% (642/493) |
| 56% (1181/916) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1522/1239) |
| 52% (10651/9792) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (13693/12701) |
| 57% (222/167) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (256/176) |
| 55% (95/78) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (199/158) |
| 59% (118/81) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (158/122) |
| 60% (65/44) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (29/37) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 3986 | Aces Total | 2779 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1149 | Total Double Faults | 1292 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:26 |
| 606.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 497.59 |
| 60% (22938/38173) | 1st Serve % | 62% (41115/66677) |
| 74% (16939/22937) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (27706/41115) |
| 52% (7855/15230) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (13443/25557) |
| 39% (1276/3303) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2628/6159) |
| 36% (14150/38769) | Return Points Win % | 39% (25403/65790) |
| 53% (56/50) | Slam W/L | 49% (56/58) |
| 43% (25/33) | Masters W/L | 47% (58/66) |
| 43% (16/21) | Cups W/L | 58% (26/19) |
| 54% (95/81) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (158/171) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (259/171) | Challenger W/L | 66% (304/155) |
| 79% (49/13) | Futures W/L | 64% (39/22) |
| 60% (480/804) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (581/1011) |
| 32% (17/53) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (51/110) |
| 56% (201/361) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (199/421) |
| 51% (148/293) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (171/343) |
| 81% (527/429) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (653/546) |
| 18% (527/97) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (653/105) |
| 20% (342/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (482/93) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
